When a divorcing husband and wife ran up legal costs of more than Ā£150,000 disputing the division of family assets amounting to little more than Ā£200,000, the judge hearing the case described himself as āappalledā.
In the initial court hearing, the wife was awarded approximately 6/7 of the coupleās joint assets. Because of her ex-husbandās substantial earnings, she was awarded Ā£3,000 a month in maintenance for herself and the coupleās three children.
When she appealed against the decision ā at a cost of a further Ā£12,500 ā the judge put his foot down, describing the way she conducted the case as āattritionalā. Whilst allowing her to appeal, he limited her recoverable costs to Ā£5,000, āto discourage profligate waste of costs, particularly in a case with a track record like thisā.
The judge hearing the appeal commented, āI recognise that the costs cap that I am imposing will mean that the wife already has unrecoverable costs… If that is what it takes to prevent what the district judge described as a haemorrhaging of money, so be it.ā
Source: News feed